(updated 11am June 12) Where to turn in your paper: You may put it under the door of my office (room 1315, 3rd floor), or in my faculty mailbox. Submit the PDF version on TritonEd, in the TurnitIn link.
Improving the course: I think I have approximately the right mix of topics in Big Data Analytics, but there are other areas that I would like to improve. For example, how can I better smooth the workload in the projects, to reduce the end-of-year crunch? Here is a BDA End-of-year questionaire that asks a series of questions about what I should change.
Thanks for taking the class – I certainly enjoy teaching it. Enjoy graduation! Enjoy life after the university!
We are finished with formal classes, so I will post here some additional advice for your projects. Most of this is based on things I noticed either in interim reports or in the final presentations on June 6. It’s going to take a few days to write and edit all of these notes, so keep checking this page through Saturday.
Some of this advice was written with one specific project or team in mind, but all of it applies to multiple projects.
- Don’t use loops in R. Most computer languages make heavy use of FOR loops. R avoids almost all uses of loops, and it runs faster and is easier to write and debug without them. Here is an example of how to rewrite code without needing a loop, taken from one of this year’s projects. In some cases, R code that avoids loops will run 100x faster (literally). BDA18 Avoid loops in R
- Don’t use CSV data when working with large datasets. CSV (Comma separated value) files have become a lingua franca for exchanging data among different computer languages and environments. For that purpose, they are decent. But they are very inefficient, in terms of both speed and using up memory. One team mentioned that they were running into memory limits, but the problem was most likely due to their keeping CSV files around! Solution: Use CSV files with read.csv to get data into R. But after that, store your data as R objects (dataframes or some other kind). If you want to store intermediate results in a file, create the object inside R, then use RStudio to save it as an R object. (File name ends in .Rdata.) When you want it again, use RStudio File/Open File command to load it. No additional conversion will be needed.
I will add something about this to the notes on Handling Big Data. Dealing with the “big” in Big Data.
- Fix unbalanced accuracy in confusion matrices. Yesterday, I noticed several confusion matrices with much higher accuracy for one case than the other. Reminder: We spent 1.5 classes on this topic, and there are multiple solutions. It’s usually due to having much more data of one type than the other. See:
- Week 8 assignments and notes
- Good graphics. Because graphics are a concise way to communicate, even with non-specialists, I recommend having at least one superb image in every report. (See BDA18 Writing your final report ). I will try to post some examples from your projects, with comments on how to make them even better. On Friday.
- Revised discussion on how to write a good final report. Writing your final report June 8
Criticizing an article that appeared on Data Science Central, about logistic regression.
I recently came across a Twitter discussion of an article on a site called Data Science Central. The article was Why Logistic Regression should be the last thing you learn when becoming a Data Scientist. [TL;DR Don’t believe the headline!]
The article purports to explain that logistic regression is a bad technique, and nobody should use it. The article is nonsense. I critiqued it in the comments, but I’m not sure the editor will allow my comment to stand. Data Science Central appears to be a one-man site, with 90% of the material written by David Granville, and it’s hard not to conclude that he made a serious mistake in writing his attack on logistic regression.
So here is my response to his article. For my students – if you read something about Data Analytics that does not make sense to you, or contradicts something you have been taught, be suspicious. You can see some of the Twitter criticism here.
I am sorry to report that this article is nonsense. It’s not the conclusion – use it or don’t use it, there are now many alternatives to logistic regression. (Which inthe machine learning world is a “linear classifier.” )
The difficulty is that most of the discussion is Just Wrong. Analytically incorrect. No correspondence to the usual definitions, use, and interpretation of logistic regression.
- The diagram is incomprehensible. If it is intended to be the standard representation of logistic regression, it has multiple errors.
- LR maps from -infinity to +infinity (on the X scale), not from 0 to 1.
- The y axisis correct.
- The colors and the points show the curve (called the logistic curve or similar) as the boundary between positive and negative outcomes, for points defined by two independent variables (shown as x and y). That is not at allwhat the curve means. See e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Logistic-curve.svg
- “There are hundreds of types of logistic regression.” Maybe in an aworld with a different definition, but the standard definition does not include Poisson models. Of courseas always there are a variety of possible algorithms that can be used to solvea logistic model.
- From https://www.medcalc.org/manual/logistic_regression.php “Logistic regression is a statistical method for analyzing a dataset in which there are one or more independent variables that determine an outcome. The outcome is measured with a dichotomous variable (in which there are only two possible outcomes).
In logistic regression, the dependent variable is binary or dichotomous, i.e. it only contains data coded as 1 (TRUE, success, pregnant, etc.) or 0 (FALSE, failure, non-pregnant, etc.).”
- “If you transform your variable you can instead use linear regression.” Yes, and that is how logistic regressions are usually solved! That is, LRs are solved by transforming the variables (using alogit transform ) and solving the resulting equation, which is linear in the variables. In practice, many other transformation equations can be used instead, but the logit transform has a nice interpretation.
- “Coefficients are not easy to interpret.” I suppose that easy is in the eye of the beholder, but there is a standard and straightforward interpretation.
- “The logistic regression coefficients show the change in the predicted logged odds of having the characteristic of interest for a one-unit change in the independent variables.” It does take a few examples to figure out what “log odds” means, unless you do a lot of horse racing. But after that, it is a clever and powerful way to think about changes in the probability of an outcome.
- The (corrected) version of the logistic curve corresponds to an equivalent way to interpret the coefficient values.
There certainly are some mild criticisms of logistic regression, but in situations where a linear model is reasonably accurate, it is a good quick model to try. Of course, if the situation is highly nonlinear, a tree model is going to be better. Furthermore, the particular logistic equation generally used should not be considered sacred.
My interpretation is that this article is an attack on a straw man, an undefined and radically unconventional model that is here being called “logistic regression.” It would be a shame if anyone took it seriously. We will see if the author/site manager leaves this comment up. If he does, I invite him to respond and explain the meaning of his diagram.
By the way, I agree with much of the discussion on the medcalcweb site I’m quoting, but not all of it.